![]() |
Kahr CW9
I have a new CW9 and have 100 rounds through the 200 round breakin shoot.
The thing works well with the exception of failing to lock open after the last shot on 3-4 occasions. How much of a concern should his be given the numer of rounds through it? What causes this? There is no hint of a failure to feed, etc. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Does it do this with more than one magazine? If not try another mag, just keep track of which mag causes the problem. The follower on the magazine is what pushes the slide stop up into position when it is empty, a bad follower can cause the problem you are having. Also it can at times be contributed to new gun stiffness and might work it's way out. I won't carry a new gun till I have at least 500 rounds through it.
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Mine had some shell ejection problems until 200 rds were fed through it, after which it ran perfectly. I say finish the breakin and see what happens.
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Just the one magazine. It is brand new and I have added extra magazines yet. I will get some others and by then will have had 200-300 through it. Thanks. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Kahrs suck, never owned one myself but the ones I have fired have always had problems...
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Interesting. Thanks.
|
Re: Kahr CW9
I just got a CW9 myself. One thing I've noticed is that being such a small gun with a light slide, the recoil spring is incredibly stiff. Until the gun is fully broken in and the recoil spring takes a set slide lock failure may happen, especially if you are using target or low power ammunition. This gun is made to work with full power defensive ammunition and with some light reloads during the break-in period mine not only failed to lock the slide but also was failing to extract and or chamber rounds. With full power ammo I had no problem whatsoever, including the hot Corbon 115gr +p 1350fps load.
If you can please let us know how things work after the full break-in period. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
If your having trouble with EVERY Kahr your shooting (as you stated) i would subjest you may be a limp wristed shooter.....and may need to stiffen up your grip |
Re: Kahr CW9
Have had two PM9s and both were 100% reliable. Other people have had some problems. Kahrs seem to be a role of the dice. If you get a good one, you will love it. I would not pass any judgement until you have the prerequisite 200 break in rds through it and then at least another 50-100 rds of premium self defense ammo.
|
Re: Kahr CW9
I've looked at the Kahr's and they're nice for a special purpose firearm.
Doesn't look like something meant to target shoot often. To me the Glock 26 is perfection in balance...size, weight, capacity, cost, reliability, and shootability. In the sub-compact line, it has no equal! |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Kahr CW9
EE, I agree that the Kahr is not a target/plinking pistol. While it's size lends itself to be a good, solid self defense/deep concealment pistol, this small size unfortunately does not bode well for longevity. The smaller, lighter parts that make up the Kahr just can not handle tens of thousands of rounds like many other larger designs. For deep concealment or as a BUG however, it is one of the best options out there.
C&L, I see your point and while a Kahr certainly conceals easier than a G26, I have carried (before I sold all of my guns) both a G27 (identical size to G26) and a G29 (almost identical to a G19 but with a shorter grip) successfully in a pocket holster for almost ten years. As with carrying most concealed pistols, wardrobe, wardrobe, wardrobe. Bx3 |
Re: Kahr CW9
Well, I finished the "shoot-in" rounds and the second 100 rounds shot in groups of 5 had the slide fail to lock back about 50% of the time. Up from around 3% in the first 100 rounds.
I have called Kahr and they are solid customer service types. They suggested a new slide lock spring and a new follower. I order a new magazine and they are sending the spring and 2 followeres along with it. Having read the great replies above just now, I am betting on the thumb on the slide release in the pilot error category. I thought if I was limp wristing, it would happen thoughout the shooting process and not just after the last shot. One shooter on another forum told me to shoot full magazines since he had a problem that only arose at that time. Something called nose diving. From the Kahr Club on Glock Talk a comment from mitchg233. "The problem was when the mag was full, the first round would hit the bottom of the feed ramp and jam there. The nose of the second round tends to push on the first round as it slides by and lowers the nose of the first round, causing it to hit lower on the ramp. My pistol was cured, in large part, by the installation of a new mag release and spring, which kept the mag more firmly in the gun and caused the first round to meet the ramp slightly higher......at least that is my guess. Anyway, break in the gun as you would use it. It is a 7+1 pistol and should be reliable that way. My whole story is in another recent thread about CW9's. Good luck. They are good pistols that are worth a little tinkering. " |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Is short-stoking the same as limp-wristing???
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
In semi-autos, the slide is designed to cycle back after firing a round to strip the next round from the magazine and feed it into the chamber. Each gun has its own "cycle point" so to speak - the point to which the slide has to travel to during its rearward motion before stopping and returning to battery. There are a number of factors that could prevent the slide from cycling all the way back to that designed point, which is called "short-stroking". Depending on how severe the short-stoking is, it could lead to problems such as FTF (failure to feed), failure to eject (FTE), failure to lock back, etc. Limp wristing is the failure of the shooter to control the gun during recoil (or not gripping the gun firmly enough) and letting it bounce around. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Unfortunately none of the respected semi-auto handgun manufacturers make a compact handgun. They chop off the barrel and shorten the grips,magazines and call them compact but they're not very concealable. Kahr fills a market void. CONCEALABILITY means THIN! Who else makes a light, servicable concealable 9MM besides the expensive Rohrbach?
Kahrs have some idiosincracies, yes. 1) You need to use the slide release when chambering a round. 2) You need a set of spare springs if you plan to shoot thousands of rounds. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
You talk about it having "lighter" parts etc etc......i suspect you may be confusing the Kahr with something like a Keltek....a Kahr is NOT a light gun for its size with light parts |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
on my long term purchase list. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Kahr PM9 feels solid like a real gun and shoots very well. Very accurate for such a small package.
I do have a problem with mine, however. The first round in the top of the magazine must be oriented upward at a fairly steep angle to correctly feed. If it is in that steep angle, everything is just lovely. However, it is quite easy to accidentally reorient the first round to a lesser angle while manipulating the magazine, or performing a tactical reload. Sometimes simply removing the magazine and placing it back into the gun will cause this top round to be more parallel with the slide. When this happens, I'm looking at a jam-fest. It will not feed. This problem was quite noticable during live training in some classes I am taking. Love the little gun, but I have had to demote it from both primary carry and primary training weapon. But, when it feeds and shoots, it shoots great. Can not recommend, however. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
VPW, I forgot to mention because it is second nature to me now but I down load all of my magazines (pistol and rifle before I sold them all) by about 10%. This works out to roughly 1 round for anything under 20rds and two rds for anything 20 rds and over. I have been shooting since I was four and I have shot with some of the best tier one military guys in the country and this is a technique for many of them. While I am not going to argue with anyone here, I believe that this is one of the factors why all of my firearms (before I sold them) were generally 100% reliable. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
This has pretty much been my accidental approach due to arthritic hands. Any plinking rounds over 5 in the CW9 weren't worth the effort nor the discomfort. I will take a different approach if this become a carry gun. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
First when you are loading a magazine under a closed slide/bolt, this will allow for an easier more positive lock up for the magazine. This will also reduce slide/bolt friction and allow the first round to be stripped from the magazine much easier. Both of these instances are especially applicable when doing tactical reloads. Secondly, one less round greatly reduces exponential pressure on the magazine spring which does help prevent spring set. Both of these issues have recently been addressed in the Army's Rifle Marksmanship Manual FM 3-22.9. Lets face it, most magazine capacity listings are designated because that is the absolute maximum amount of rounds that a magazine can hold. This means that the follower and the spring are literally smashed into the base plate without a millimeter to spare. Some newer magazines are starting to come out that actually address this problem by allowing for some breathing room between the internal magazine components (about what you would have if you just downloaded by 10%). These new magazines will be true capacity magazines and you will be able to load them to their full claim without sacrificing reliability. Tango Down is one company that is making these true capacity magazines for ARs. :coolbeer: Bx3 |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Have you tried using the slide release to slam the first round in? Doing it by hand causes it to jam and this is a well known Kahr idiosyncracy. |
Re: Kahr CW9
I am not a Kahr fanatic but to me it fits its CCW purpose perfectly i have many other CCW guns and the Kahr seems to do it the best for me.....my second choice is a RugerSP101 357/38sp but its much harder to conceal
These are intresting conversations and things for me to watch....todate though i have had no issues of any sort with mine....no feed issues...no breakages..i regularly hand cycle the action with no issues...i am probably around 1k rounds I do carry a clip loaded with shot shells for snake killin and such and mine will even feed shot shells I am intrested in obtaining some extra clips anyone know a low cost source? |
Re: Kahr CW9
I think Kahr was the only real source when I picked up some extra magazines a few years back. If you are going to go through them you may as well pick up an extra recoil spring assembly as I believe they recommend a replacement every few thousand rounds or so. They actually didn't charge me for the springs when I ordered the extra mags. They also have a redesigned (as of last year) magazine latch. More metal, less plastic. They also sent that out for free. I have been very impressed with their customer care. Bx3
|
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Yes, I understand that and have experimented both ways. Quickly, here is how to see the problem I'm having (if your Kahr behaves like mine does). 1) With empty gun, insert loaded magazine. 2) Chamber a round using your prefered method. 3) Fire that round. Alternately, you can simulate the firing of a round by pulling back the slide ejecting that round, and then releasing the slide thus chambering a new round. (In my experience it doesn't matter much which you do for this test.) 4) Remove the magazine. 5) Examine the top round in the magazine. In the case of my weapon, you will without fail, find that the topmost round in the magazine has been pushed forward in the magazine. It is not deeply seated, but is in a more forward position. Notice that with your finger you can rock the round upwards and downwards with extreme ease. As long as the round is rocked upwards, you will have no problem. If you rock it downwards (eliminating the upward slope) and place it back in the weapon, you will have a jam situation on your next round. Sometimes simply placing the magazine back in the weapon is enough to rock it downwards and cause the problem. Like if you were doing a tactical reload (reloading when you didn't absolutely need to). Not to beat a dead horse, but there is my problem. Would be interested if others can create this problem. If you push the topmost round back into the magazine as if you had just loaded it by hand, there is no problem. If you don't, in my case, there is no telling, but likely you get a jam. Sorry if this is a hijack. I like the gun except for this "feature" on mine. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
Quote:
Bingo! Had similar issues with mine when cambering the first round.. To put it simply I could not trust the gun 100% with my life, SO.. I sold it and bought a Rohrbaugh R9s and never looked back.. Best decision I could have made with regard to pocket pistols. |
Re: Kahr CW9
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM